Contact us 
Login Why Traditional Cybersecurity Processes Slow You Down and How to Deal with It
Do you find yourself bogged down with repetitive, mundane security and compliance tasks? Security service providers juggle numerous responsibilities, like risk assessments, policy development, compliance mapping and continuous monitoring. These initiatives demand precision, but manually managing them introduces inefficiencies that drain resources, slow execution and increase frustration.
In this article, we’ll explore the traditional processes that slow security teams down, the business impact of these inefficiencies and how automation can help you leave behind the friction so you can grow and scale your business instead.
The Tedious Tasks of Security Service Providers
Managed security service providers shoulder a vast array of responsibilities. While these obligations are critical for ensuring their clients get the best security and compliance services, they can also be tedious and time-consuming, if they aren’t executed efficiently.
Duties like risk and compliance assessments, creating security policies and calculating risk scores, among others, often require meticulous attention to detail. When done manually, time is spent excruciatingly collecting and reconciling information across disparate systems and frameworks and inputting it in spreadsheets, emails, collaboration tools, or legacy systems. Then, they require analyzing the data and generating reports, plans and policies. These all need to be consistently communicated to the client and managed.
There is also the laborious need of continuous reviewing and learning of new lengthy security and compliance frameworks and regulations, industry standards and threats. This is followed by the need to interpret these requirements, and adapt them to security policies. In the end, you also have to document everything.
And even after you’re done – you start over. Service providers need to repeat these actions again and and again, some on a weekly or monthly basis, and for each new client.
A non-exhaustive list of such responsibilities includes:
- Assessing security and compliance risks
- Calculating risk scores
- Developing security policies
- Mapping compliance and security frameworks
- Creating a security plan
- Managing security and compliance tasks
- Maintaining an up-to-date holistic view of security and compliance posture
- Reporting to leadership
- Managing security budgets
- Developing incident response plans
- And more
Why Manual Work Is Holding vCISOs Back
The repetitive and manual nature of security and compliance tasks is more than a minor inconvenience; it’s operationally draining. Slow and arduous processes can lead to:
- Security teams struggling to keep up with requirements and deadlines.
- Time spent on administrative tasks, maintenance, tools and data searches rather than higher-impact initiatives and strategic security goals.
- Time wasted on duplicate efforts, back and forths and version controls.
- Low energy and frustration.
- Micro-management of processes.
- Senior staff performing junior staff work.
- New team members struggle to ramp up quickly.
- Increased likelihood of errors, missed updates and outdated policies.
- Difficulty providing clear, timely insights to executives.
The Result: Stalled Business Growth
These inefficient processes create significant roadblocks to business growth. Instead of enabling the service provider to move faster and scale their business, workflows and processes become a bottleneck. When a company cannot swiftly deliver security and compliance services, deals are delayed, or even lost entirely.
Growth is also stalled. Security leaders, who should be focused on future-proofing the organization, are instead stuck managing basic tasks in a reactive rather than proactive manner. Plus, new hires face steep learning curves due to disorganized and overly manual workflows, further reducing operational efficiency.
Automation: The Key to Faster, Smarter, and More Scalable Security
Inefficiencies waste valuable resources: time, money and team efforts. Instead, service providers can automate security and compliance workflows and processes. This will enable them to move faster, work smarter, and drive business growth.
How?
First and foremost, automation drives faster execution. Compliance audits, risk assessments and other security tasks that once took weeks can now be done in days or hours. They are also less prone to errors, since automation enforces best practices and prevents mistakes from manual configurations or data entry. Plus, they provide quick views and insights, allowing service providers to make quick data-driven decisions that keep clients informed and help position themselves as trusted experts and business partners.
Automation also creates standardization, allowing new team members to seamlessly onboard, as well as the ability to easily onboard new clients. Junior team members can also perform tasks previously requiring senior security leaders.
As a result, services providers can reallocate budgets previously used for headcount on innovation and growth, and focus their own time on high-value, strategic work instead of repetitive tasks.
Traditional vs. Automated Performance of Security Tasks
Let’s look at a few example tasks and how they are executed manually vs. automated.
| Task | Traditional | Automated |
| Assessing Security and Compliance Risks | Security teams manually analyze questionnaires, review logs and interview stakeholders. Data is manually inputted in spreadsheets and analyzed. The assessment is done as a one-time assessment. | Continuous scanning tools identify vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and compliance gaps. Questionnaires are generated and analyzed automatically. Assessments are continuously updated. |
| Calculating Risk Scores | Analysts assign qualitative risk levels based on expertise and spreadsheets. | Risk management platforms use AI and predefined models to score risks dynamically. An automated platform connects risk scores to task priorities. |
| Developing Security Policies | Policies are drafted from scratch, reviewed and manually updated. | Policy engines automatically generate, distribute and enforce policies based on regulations and security best practices. |
| Mapping Compliance and Security Frameworks | Teams manually review and compare controls across frameworks using spreadsheets and correlate with the risk assessment spreadsheet
Or Legacy GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) tools map and crosswalk frameworks. |
Risk assessment is automatically correlated to the framework of choice, connected to policies and security tasks and automatically updated as the security plan progresses. |
| Creating a Security Plan | Security leaders define strategy based on assessments and best practices. | AI-driven platforms generate security plans tailored to industry regulations and risk exposure. |
| Managing Security and Compliance Tasks | Tasks are tracked in emails, spreadsheets and ticketing systems. | Workflow automation platforms assign, track and enforce security tasks with alerts. |
| Maintaining an Up-to-Date Holistic View of Security and Compliance Posture | Security teams compile data from multiple sources into reports. This is done occasionally. | Dashboards integrate real-time data for a centralized view that is constantly updated. |
| Reporting to Leadership | Reports are manually compiled from logs, audits, and assessments | Security reporting tools generate visualized, executive-friendly reports on demand. |
How to Implement Security and Compliance Automation
There are three main approaches to automating your security processes:
1. Build Your Own (Custom Automation) – Develop in-house scripts, APIs, and workflows tailored to your organization’s specific needs. Integrate security tools, compliance frameworks, and reporting dashboards.
Pros: Maximum flexibility
Cons: Requires significant engineering resources and ongoing maintenance, which dilutes the value of automation. Plus, you are required to research and ensure continuous use of best-of-breed technologies and algorithms, which is not your focus.
2. Use a GRC Platform – Pre-built automation for risk assessments, compliance tracking and reporting.
Pros: Centralized compliance, automatic mapping
Cons: Limited scope and limited scalability, requiring setup and customization work, and ultimately requiring manual processes to complement, leading to the same challenges we started with.
3. Automated Cybersecurity & Compliance Hub – All-in-one platforms that automate risk assessments, security controls, compliance and security frameworks, risk scoring and reporting in real time.
Pros: Ready-to-use, everything inside, proven ROI
Cons: Less customizable compared to the other options
Best for: Fast-growing service providers looking for scalable, hands-off security and compliance automation.
Cynomi’s vCISO platform is a cybersecurity and compliance management hub empowering service providers to scale their services by standardizing processes and automating time-consuming tasks. Powered by AI infused with CISO knowledge, Cynomi enables service providers to efficiently manage cybersecurity for more clients -saving time, boosting productivity, and enhancing service quality.
