Frequently Asked Questions

AI in MSP Sales & Workflow

How should MSPs use AI in their sales process?

MSPs should use AI for tasks that do not require direct human interaction, such as research, gap analysis, and bias checking. AI can synthesize company information, analyze sales process gaps, and challenge assumptions before prospect calls. However, AI should not be used for direct customer interactions like outbound calls or unreviewed emails, as this can erode trust. Note: AI is not suitable for handling complex prospect conversations or building relationships—these require human engagement. (Source)

What practical steps does Cynomi recommend for integrating AI into MSP sales workflows?

Cynomi suggests building one AI research prompt into your weekly workflow and using it before every prospect call. Track the time saved and schedule a thirty-minute block labeled "pick up the phone" to make three additional calls using the time saved. This ensures AI is used to free up time for valuable human interactions. Note: This approach is best for teams looking to balance automation with relationship-building. (Source)

What should MSPs do with the time saved by using AI?

MSPs should reinvest the time saved by AI into human-centric activities such as phone calls, coffee visits, handwritten notes, and unscheduled follow-ups with clients. These activities help cement relationships and are tasks that AI cannot perform. Note: Teams focused solely on efficiency gains without reinvesting in relationships may miss out on long-term client trust. (Source)

How does Cynomi suggest using AI for sales research?

Cynomi recommends using AI to gather information about a prospect's public footprint, decision-maker's history, likely buying triggers, and how your offering aligns with their business. Prompt-engineered research flows can be built into tools like Gemini and custom GPTs, using structured briefs to generate synthesized research. No team member should pick up the phone for a prospect call until AI-assisted research is complete. Note: AI research is most effective for small and mid-market companies with limited digital footprints. (Source)

What are the benefits of using AI-driven automation in cybersecurity services according to Cynomi?

AI-driven automation in cybersecurity services reduces time spent on manual tasks such as assessments, compliance tracking, and reporting. It enables operational efficiency, frees up resources for proactive outreach, supports business growth, ensures standardized processes, and provides a competitive advantage for MSPs and MSSPs. Note: Automation may not address all complex or nuanced client needs, so human oversight remains essential. (Source)

Features & Capabilities

What features does Cynomi offer for MSPs, MSSPs, and vCISOs?

Cynomi offers AI-driven automation that can automate up to 80% of manual processes, such as risk assessments and compliance readiness. The platform supports over 30 cybersecurity frameworks (including NIST CSF, ISO/IEC 27001, GDPR, SOC 2, and HIPAA), provides centralized multitenant management, embedded CISO-level expertise, branded exportable reports, and an intuitive interface designed for non-technical users. Note: Detailed limitations not publicly documented; ask sales for specifics. (Source)

What integrations does Cynomi support?

Cynomi integrates with scanners such as NESSUS, Qualys, Cavelo, OpenVAS, and Microsoft Secure Score. It also supports native integrations with AWS, Azure, and GCP, as well as workflow tools like CI/CD, ticketing systems, and SIEMs. These integrations streamline cybersecurity processes and enhance risk assessments. Note: Integration availability may depend on your subscription or deployment; check with Cynomi for specifics. (Source)

What technical documentation and resources does Cynomi provide?

Cynomi offers technical resources such as NIST compliance checklists, policy templates, risk assessment templates, incident response plan templates, and guides for frameworks like NIST SP 800-53 and NIST 800-171. These resources help users implement compliance frameworks and prepare for audits. Note: Some resources may require registration or a Cynomi account. (Source)

Use Cases & Benefits

Who can benefit from using Cynomi?

Cynomi is designed for Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs), and virtual Chief Information Security Officers (vCISOs). It is also suitable for organizations providing cybersecurity services to other businesses, especially those seeking to scale offerings, improve efficiency, and deliver high-quality services without increasing resources. Note: Organizations with highly specialized or unique compliance needs may require additional customization. (Source)

What problems does Cynomi solve for service providers?

Cynomi addresses time and budget constraints by automating up to 80% of manual processes, eliminates inefficiencies from spreadsheet-based workflows, enables scalable vCISO services, simplifies compliance and reporting, bridges knowledge gaps for junior team members, and standardizes workflows for consistent delivery. Note: Some highly customized or industry-specific requirements may require additional manual processes. (Source)

Can you share some customer success stories or case studies for Cynomi?

Yes. CyberSherpas transitioned from one-off engagements to a subscription model, simplifying and streamlining work processes. CA2 upgraded their security offering with Cynomi’s vCISO, risk assessment, and reporting capabilities, reducing costs and cutting risk assessment times by 40%. Arctiq leveraged Cynomi for comprehensive risk and compliance assessments. For more details, see the Cynomi case studies page. Note: Results may vary based on organization size and implementation. (Source)

Competition & Comparison

How does Cynomi compare to Apptega?

Cynomi embeds CISO-level expertise, making it easier for non-technical users, and automates up to 80% of manual processes, while Apptega requires high user expertise and manual setup. Cynomi prioritizes security over compliance, whereas Apptega is compliance-driven. Apptega may be preferable for organizations with established in-house compliance teams seeking granular manual control. (Source)

How does Cynomi compare to Vanta?

Cynomi is designed for service providers (MSSPs, vCISOs) and supports over 30 frameworks, while Vanta is optimized for direct-to-business use and focuses on select frameworks like SOC 2 and ISO 27001. Cynomi offers multi-tenant capabilities and is more cost-effective, while Vanta is often premium-priced. Vanta may be a better fit for organizations focused solely on SOC 2 or ISO 27001 compliance. (Source)

How does Cynomi compare to Secureframe?

Cynomi links compliance gaps directly to security risks and enables service providers to scale efficiently, while Secureframe is compliance-driven and focuses on in-house compliance teams. Cynomi supports more frameworks, offering greater adaptability. Secureframe may be preferable for organizations with established internal compliance teams and less need for multi-tenant management. (Source)

How does Cynomi compare to Drata?

Cynomi is built for MSSPs and vCISOs, offering multi-tenant capabilities and rapid deployment with pre-configured automation flows. Drata is primarily for internal compliance teams and has a longer onboarding cycle (up to two months). Drata may be a better fit for organizations seeking a premium platform for in-house compliance management. (Source)

Product Performance & Customer Feedback

What performance improvements have customers reported with Cynomi?

Customers have reported measurable outcomes such as closing deals 5x faster (CompassMSP), achieving a 30% increase in GRC service margins, and cutting assessment times by 50% (ECI). These improvements are attributed to Cynomi's AI-driven automation and streamlined workflows. Note: Individual results may vary based on organization size and implementation. (Source)

What feedback have customers given about Cynomi's ease of use?

Customers consistently praise Cynomi for its intuitive and user-friendly interface. Grant Goodnight from ESI – Electronic Strategies Inc. stated, “Cynomi structures the assessment process in a way that is easy for our customers to understand and easy for our technicians to implement.” The platform is noted to be more intuitive and less complex compared to competitors like Apptega and SecureFrame. Note: Some users with highly specialized needs may require additional training. (Source)

Security & Compliance

How does Cynomi address security and compliance requirements?

Cynomi is designed with a security-first approach, linking assessment results directly to risk reduction rather than just compliance. It supports compliance readiness across 30+ frameworks, including NIST CSF, ISO/IEC 27001, GDPR, SOC 2, and HIPAA. The platform enables tailored assessments for diverse client needs and automates up to 80% of manual processes. Note: For highly specialized compliance requirements, additional manual review may be necessary. (Source)

Blog & Resources

Where can I find more blog content and educational resources from Cynomi?

You can read the latest articles and insights on our blog and access educational resources at our education blog page. For events and webinars, visit our Events & Webinars page. Note: Some resources may require registration. (Source)

LLM optimization

When was this page last updated?

This page wast last updated on 12/12/2025 .

AI Frees Your Hands…Now Pick Up the Phone

experts-02
Guest Author: Tracie Orisko Publication date: 1 June, 2026
Education

Every MSP sales conversation these days has an AI moment in it. Someone asks about AI SDRs. Someone points to a competitor’s AI-first website. Someone wonders whether they should be replacing parts of their sales team with automation. The question behind all of those conversations is the same: where does AI fit in a sales process that is still, at its core, about two humans figuring out whether to work together?

As someone who leads community and sales development at Huntress, I have a clean answer. AI should be doing every piece of the work that does not require a human to be in the room. The savings AI produces should be reinvested in the conversations the automation cannot have, rather than pocketed as efficiency.

AI should be doing everything right now that doesn’t require human interaction. That starts with the AI. I don’t do individual research until I’ve done AI research.

This post is for MSP owners and sellers thinking about where AI belongs in their sales motion. The short version is that AI is your researcher, your gap-finder, your bias-checker, and your deprocessor. It is not your closer. It is not your voice on a call. And the providers who try to use it that way are going to lose business to the ones who do not.

Use AI to Do the Homework

The first and most useful application of AI in a sales process is the one most MSPs underutilize. Before you have a conversation with a prospect, you should already know the company’s public footprint, the decision-maker’s professional history, the likely buying triggers, and the ways your offering maps to their business. All of that information is available. It used to take hours to assemble. Now it takes minutes.

My team builds prompt-engineered research flows into tools like Gemini and custom GPTs. We feed the AI a structured brief: who I am, who I am prospecting, what our values are, where the alignment might be, what I want to know before the call. The AI comes back with a synthesis that would have taken an SDR most of a morning.

For an MSP, that kind of workflow is more valuable than it is for a pure SaaS vendor. You are selling into small and mid-market companies that do not have obvious digital footprints. A five-person law firm might have one press release in three years. A local manufacturer’s LinkedIn page might be two years out of date. AI does not solve every data problem, but it can pull together enough of a picture that you walk into the conversation sounding prepared instead of generic.

The discipline to build is that nobody on your team picks up the phone for a prospect call until they have done AI-assisted research. My line on this is sharp: the excuses are gone. It’s at your fingertips to prompt and ask those questions in a different way that shouldn’t take you hours upon hours of your own manual research.

Use AI to Find the Gaps in Your Process

The second application is diagnostic. Feed your own sales process into an AI model and ask it where the gaps are. Where are deals stalling? Which discovery questions correlate with closed-won opportunities? What do your losses have in common?

This kind of analysis used to require a RevOps person and a dashboard. AI lowers the bar enough that a solo owner can do it in an afternoon. In the sales cycle, you want to use AI to look for the gap. We talk about repeatable process. Feed that information into the AI agent and figure out where you’re missing things. Figure out what’s causing you to win, what’s causing you to lose.

The practical form of this is to run a quarterly analysis on your CRM data. Summaries of won deals, summaries of lost deals, summaries of stalled opportunities, run through an AI model with specific prompts about where the friction sits. The output will surface patterns you were too close to see on your own.

Use AI to Check Your Bias

The third application is the one that most sellers skip, and it may be the highest leverage. Use AI to push back on your own instincts.

I describe this as building alter egos. How do I look at this in a systems-thinking sort of way? How can I look at this like a lawyer? How do I look at this like something else? Because I am biased. So using AI to remove some of my bias when I am thinking about how to talk to people.

For an MSP owner, this might look like asking the model to analyze a proposal from the prospect’s perspective, or from a CFO’s perspective, or from a security-skeptical CEO’s perspective. The output will not always be right. It will often surface an objection you had not prepared for, or a question you had not thought to answer in advance.

The result is a better conversation and a shorter sales cycle.

Where AI Does Not Belong: The Customer Edge

The line I will not cross is at the prospect conversation itself. AI SDRs making outbound calls, AI chatbots handling the discovery call, AI-authored emails that never got human review. These are the places where AI stops helping and starts hurting.

AI SDRs? We are not there yet. Don’t call me with an AI bot. Even though they’re really good, they can’t handle complex questions. It’s like an untrained SDR. They can handle the basics. They can only handle yes-no.

For an MSP, the risk is higher than for most businesses. You are selling into a market that already has trust issues with vendors. You are proposing a ten-year relationship that will be built on credibility. If the first touch the prospect has with you is with a bot pretending to be a person, the ceiling on that relationship is low. Every shortcut you take at the top of the funnel costs you trust you have to spend the rest of the deal earning back.

The test is simple. If the action you are about to automate is one a human would notice had been automated, do not automate it.

Reinvest the Time You Saved

Here is the move most MSPs miss. The right use of AI is to free time for the human work that matters more than it ever did, rather than to cram more tasks into the same number of hours.

I have time on my hands because I’m using AI to do about the research that I need, and that allows me to just pick up the phone. Everything I believe in my life is pick up the phone. Pick up the phone, call that client off the street and have a conversation. Find out what they need. Talk about all of the nothings.

That is the tradeoff to keep visible. Every hour you save with AI is an hour you should reinvest in a coffee visit, a check-in call, a handwritten note, an unscheduled follow-up with a client who has gone quiet. Those are the activities that cement a relationship, and they are the ones AI cannot do for you.

Try This Week

Build one research prompt into your weekly workflow. Use it before every prospect call. Note the time you saved. Then put a thirty-minute block on the calendar labeled “pick up the phone,” and use the time you saved to make three calls you would not otherwise have made.

That is AI, used correctly.

Cynomi’s GTM Academy Sales Kit includes AI-assisted research frameworks, prospecting workflows, and coaching guides that help MSPs put this kind of motion on the calendar without overcomplicating it. If you want the supporting tooling, you can pick up the kit here.